Dimensions

 

 

https://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths/dimension.htm

Extract

But the fact that we can’t move through a fourth spatial dimension or perceive one doesn’t necessarily rule out its existence. In 1919, mathematician Theodor Kaluza theorized that a fourth spatial dimension might link general relativity and electromagnetic theory [source: Groleau]. But where would it go? Theoretical physicist Oskar Klein later revised the theory, proposing that the fourth dimension was merely curled up, while the other three spatial dimensions are extended. In other words, the fourth dimension is there, only it’s rolled up and unseen, a little like a fully retracted tape measure. Furthermore, it would mean that every point in our three-dimensional world would have an additional fourth spatial dimension rolled away inside it.

String theorists, however, need a slightly more complicated vision to empower their superstring theories about the cosmos. In fact, it’s quite easy to assume they’re showing off a bit in proposing 10 or 11 dimensions including time.

Wait, don’t let that blow your mind just yet. One way of envisioning this is to imagine that each point of our 3-D world contains not a retracted tape measure, but a curled-up, six-dimensional geometric shape. One such example is a Calabi-Yau shape, which looks a bit like a cross between a mollusk, an M.C. Escher drawing and a “Star Trek” holiday ornament [source: Bryant].

Think of it this way: A concrete wall looks solid and firm from a distance. Move in closer, however, and you’ll see the dimples and holes that mark its surface. Move in even closer, and you’d see that it’s made up of molecules and atoms. Or consider a cable: From a distance it appears to be a single, thick strand. Get right next to it, and you’ll find that it’s woven from countless strands. There’s always greater complexity than meets the eye, and this hidden complexity may well conceal all those tiny, rolled-up dimensions.

Yet, we can only remain certain of our three spatial dimensions and one of time. If other dimensions await us, they’re beyond our limited perception — for now.

 

2 thoughts on “Dimensions

  1. We can always project 4D shapes onto surfaces by using the laws of perspective, just as we can make 2D drawings of 3D objects. I find the results to be fascinating:

    See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space#/media/File:8-cell-simple.gif
    for example.

    Although time is often referred to as a fourth dimension, it is a different concept – the minus sign in the space-time equation separates it from our familiar dimensions:
    dS² = dx² +dy² + dz² – c²dt²

    Hey! I’ve written an equation in a blog post 🙂

    Mike

Comments are closed.