I look up our small street,
To see if you are coming.
I don’t know what time it is,
But I think I hear you humming.

https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/04/why-teaching-poetry-is-so-important/360346/

“Students can learn how to utilize grammar in their own writing by studying how poets do—and do not—abide by traditional writing rules in their work. Poetry can teach writing and grammar conventions by showing what happens when poets strip them away or pervert them for effect. Dickinson often capitalizes common nouns and uses dashes instead of commas to note sudden shifts in focus. Agee uses colons to create dramatic, speech-like pauses. Cummings of course rebels completely. He usually eschews capitalization in his proto-text message poetry, wrapping frequent asides in parentheses and leaving last lines dangling on their pages, period-less. In “next to of course god america i,” Cummings strings together, in the first 13 lines, a cavalcade of jingoistic catch-phrases a politician might utter, and the lack of punctuation slowing down and organizing the assault accentuates their unintelligibility and banality and heightens the satire. The abuse of conventions helps make the point. In class, it can help a teacher explain the exhausting effect of run-on sentences—or illustrate how clichés weaken an argument.

Yet, despite all of the benefits poetry brings to the classroom, I have been hesitant to use poems as a mere tool for teaching grammar conventions. Even the in-class disembowelment of a poem’s meaning can diminish the personal, even transcendent, experience of reading a poem. Billy Collins characterizes the latter as a “deadening” act that obscures the poem beneath the puffed-up importance of its interpretation. In his poem “Introduction to Poetry,” he writes:  “all they want to do is tie the poem to a chair with rope/and torture a confession out of it./They begin beating it with a hose/to find out what it really means.””

“There’s something else in my past that I only recently realized contributed to my perseverance in writing poems, and that is my love of chess. I was taught the game in wartime Belgrade by a retired professor of astronomy when I was six years old and over the next few years became good enough to beat not just all the kids my age, but many of the grownups in the neighborhood. My first sleepless nights, I recall, were due to the games I lost and replayed in my head. Chess made me obsessive and tenacious. Already then, I could not forget each wrong move, each humiliating defeat. I adored games in which both sides are reduced to a few figures each and in which every single move is of momentous significance. Even today, when my opponent is a computer program (I call it “God”) that outwits me nine out of ten times, I’m not only in awe of its superior intelligence, but find my losses far more interesting to me than my infrequent wins. The kinds of poems I write—mostly short and requiring endless tinkering—often recall for me games of chess. They depend for their success on word and image being placed in proper order and their endings must have the inevitability and surprise of an elegantly executed checkmate.

Of course, it is easy to say all this now. When I was eighteen years old, I had other worries. My parents had split up and I was on my own, working in an office in Chicago and attending university classes at night. Later on, in 1958, when I moved to New York, I led the same kind of life. I wrote poems and published a few of them in literary magazines, but I didn’t expect that any of that activity would amount to much. People I worked with and befriended had no inkling that I was a poet. I also painted a little and found it easier to confess that interest to a stranger. All I knew with any certainty about my poems is that they were not as good as I wanted them to be and that I was determined, for my own peace of mind, to write something I wouldn’t be embarrassed to show my literary friends. In the meantime, there were other more pressing things to attend to, like getting married, paying the rent, hanging out in bars and jazz clubs, and every night before going to bed baiting the mousetraps in my apartment on East 13th Street with peanut butter.”

Why I Still Write Poetry

Nine years since my sister died
Eight years since getting a computer

Eight years living with my Father also alive.
Seven years of writing poetry
Seven years in grammar school
Six years in primary school
Five years for GCE study
Four years piano lessons
Three years  doing my degree and three years being at home before entering nursery school
Two years doing A  and S levels and in Nursery school [ not at the same time]
One year plus studying cello
Less than one year of being unable speak in sentences and hence being allowed or able to be a baby.

http://orwell.ru/library/reviews/nonsense/english/e_nons

“See-saw, Margery Daw,
Sold her bed and lay upon straw.
Wasn’t she a silly slut
To sell her bed and lie upon dirt?

It may be that there was once a real person called Margery Daw, and perhaps there was even a Dobbin who somehow came into the story. When Shakespeare makes Edgar in King Lear quote “Pillicock sat on Pillicock hill”, and similar fragments, he is uttering nonsense, but no doubt these fragments come from forgotten ballads in which they once had a meaning. The typical scrap of folk poetry which one quotes almost unconsciously is not exactly nonsense but a sort of musical comment on some recurring event, such as “One a penny, two a penny, Hot-Cross buns”, or “Polly, put the kettle on, we’ll all have tea”. Some of these seemingly frivolous rhymes actually express a deeply pessimistic view of life, the churchyard wisdom of the peasant. For instance:

Solomon Grundy,
Born on Monday,
Christened on Tuesday,
Married on Wednesday,
Took ill on Thursday,
Worse on Friday,
Died on Saturday,
Buried on Sunday,
And that was the end of Solomon Grundy.

which is a gloomy story, but remarkably similar to yours or mine.

Until Surrealism made a deliberate raid on the unconscious, poetry that aimed at being nonsense, apart from the meaningless refrains of songs, does not seem to have been common. This gives a special position to Edward Lear, whose nonsense rhymes have just been edited by Mr R. L. Megroz, who was also responsible for the Penguin edition a year or two before the war. Lear was one of the first writers to deal in pure fantasy, with imaginary countries and made-up words, without any satirical purpose. His poems are not all of them equally nonsensical; some of them get their effect by a perversion of logic, but they are all alike in that their underlying feeling is sad and not bitter. They express a kind of amiable lunacy, a natural sympathy with whatever is weak and absurd. Lear could fairly be called the originator of the limerick, though verses in almost the same metrical form are to be found in earlier writers, and what is sometimes considered a weakness in his limericks — that is, the fact that the rhyme is the same in the first and last lines — is part of their charm. The very slight change increases the impression of ineffectuality, which might be spoiled if there were some striking surprise. For example:

There was a young lady of Portugal
Whose ideas were excessively nautical;
She climbed up a tree
To examine the sea,
But declared she would never leave Portugal.

It is significant that almost no limericks since Lear’s have been both printable and funny enough to seem worth quoting. But he is really seen at his best in certain longer poems, such as “The Owl and the Pussy-Cat” or “The Courtship of the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bт”:

On the Coast of Coromandel,
Where the early pumpkins blow,
In the middle of the woods
Lived the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bт.
Two old chairs, and half a candle
One old jug without a handle
These were all his worldly goods:
In the middle of the woods,
These were all the worldly goods
Of the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bт,
Of the Yonghy-Bonghy-Bт.

After Mass on Sunday Mary decided to visit Stan, her elderly, gentle and frail husband in the Rehabilitation Unit where he had been sent recently by a strange physiotherapist…He was unhappy as the diuretics made him pee even more often than he used to do and he got very worried about it because his bad heart made it extremely hard for him to walk.
When she went into the small four bed ward she saw Stan sitting on his chair without any pyjama trousers on even though it was visiting time from 3 to 8 pm.
Why has he no trousers on? Mary asked a nurse angrily, her singularly blue eyes full of unshed glistening tears which almost washed off her turquoise mascara and made runnels in her honey beige foundation by Rimmel of London and Paris
He keeps wanting to go to the toilet so it’s easier for us all if he has no pants on, the nurse told her haughtily.He’s on diuretics, you see as he has water in his lungs and other inner organs and the water has to be removed from his body, Sheila ,the nurse announced in a cold voice
What about the lack of dignity in baring him to the world, Mary enquired softly yet piercingly her eyes dripping tears again.
Dignity ,what’s that? the nurse said insolently.He is just a pest. And old men don’t deserve any attention.We are tired of them.They should all die now.That’s government policy it appears
Emile who had hidden in Mary’s old, but good olive green Radley leather handbag let out a sound like a banshee in Cork or a demon in a nightmare.
The nurse looked quite frightened
What’s that? she whispered to Mary behind her hand.
It’s probably Satan coming to say ” hello” to you as you seem very wicked to me.Mary informed her politely yet honestly in her Northern way.
Oh my,what shall I do? the nurse asked in a trembling voice.I am so upset now.
You could try reading the Ten Commandments, Mary riposted jocosely… if it’s not too late.
Or recalling the Golden Rule………
I’ve never heard of the golden rule, said the nurse.Is it a measuring instrument of some unusual type?
Yes,in a sense it is, Mary said.It measures us by our compassion towards others.And you seem to have none for Stan.Can you not imagine what it’s like being a man sitting half naked in a public room with no recourse?
What’s a recourse, Sheila, the nurse, asked her thoughtfully,Is it a garment like a dressing gown?
No,it’s a a source of help in a difficult situation.It’s a remedy or an option
I have a higher degree in nursing,Sheila boasted stupidly.
I don’t care if you have a doctorate in nursing and philosophy,Mary cried.It’s what you do and say to the patients that counts.And going to an evening class in English would do you no harm.Your vocabulary is limited,to say the least.And words are useful whatever job you do.Or even if you are unemployed it helps you deal with bureaucrats
Oh,dear,said the nurse,I am sorry for being so thoughtless.I am always thinking about sex,love and clothes instead of the patients.I see now I have fallen into evil ways and hope I can improve a little.
You have been cruel, said Mary.And seeing my aged husband like this is breaking my heart.
She went over to Stan and sat by him.He fell against her bosom hungrily.Alas it was not for erotic reasons.His blood sugar was only 2 and his BP was 60/40.He was dying there with no trousers on and with no-one but Mary to help him… and Emile, their small intelligent black cat ,of course.Unfortunately Emile’s trousers were too small for Stan

.Mary wrapped a bath towel around Stan and held him in her arms.
Stan tried to speak but Mary could not make out what he was saying.Tears ran down her beautiful lined and wrinkled face and dripped onto Stan’s head.I suppose one might say it was a kind of baptism by love.Now Stan will soon be entering a new dimension and will be given a new and better name by One who cannot be named here.But you catch my drift?

Judgement is mine says the Lord.

Stan collapsed, his face went black.Only then was he sent to a real hospital with full equipment.He died, looking happy, the next day.His last words
“So many lovely friends”
Emile was crying on Mary’s lap.
Don’t worry Emile.He was very unhappy.
So am I, Emile wept
Then Mary wept herself.What a pity Emile is a cat and so cannot embrace the person he calls “Mother”

My head is reeling and my nails all broke
To rip the backs off phones is not for blokes.
If this goes on, my ears will start to smoke

I see a man  I fancy, by the oak
I’m jiggered so I wonder, will he cope?
My hair is looking wild, my nails all broke.

It might be an ash, don’t worry folks
I’ll tie myself to this one with a rope
If this keeps on, my ears will burn and smoke

When I was younger, no-one sold  me coke
I don’t need drugs, hallucinations gawp!
My hair is looking wild, my nails all broke.

Cats may mew and frogs might want to croak
All I want are books  or I shall mope
If life keeps up, my ears will start to smoke

How much is the rail fair up to Stoke?
How much does one pay for Chanel soap?
My hair is looking  golden  in this light

I think this villanelle was unprovoked
As a tactic, it may be mistake
My head is reeling and my nails all broke
If this goes on, my I will want to  smoke

Scientists tell us what the wise might think
That frosty chill makes poor old people die
See, it’s in the Guardian in ink.

I wonder if it harms the eyes to wink?
Do fluorescent light tubes injure flies
Scientists tell us what the odd might think.

Why do women dress their lips in pink?
What do genes do when their bearer dies?
See, it’s in the Daily Groat in ink

Do you know in daydreams we can’t blink?
Metaphors are dead, yet telling lies.
Scientists tell us what the wireless think!

Re open minds, the light gets through the chinks
If my mind is closed, I’m sterilised
I’ll put it in a Telegraph in ink.

Wittgenstein said  our metaphors aren’t lies
Concrete thinking is no use in life
Scientists tell us what we cannot think!
Ye Gods, it’s in the Oxford mag in mink.

I met a man who boasted of his prayers
And of the great good works that he would do
He wrote to someone dying  in despair
Who are you that I should pray for you?

This puts him on a level with the Lord
He  will not pray for us, he bears contempt
He  will not let the free flow of his words
Add to the songs of love all  heaven sent

But who is going to be the Judge of all?
Who can ask us rightly, who are you?
No human being  is too low, too small
For God to use them in his retinue.

The man who judges others, his self harms
Fascinated by the image of his charms.

The scientific approach to the phenomenon of human nature enables us to be ignorant without being frightened, and without, therefore, having to invent all sorts of weird theories to explain away our gaps in knowledge.

Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone, Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone. Silence the pianos and with muffled drum Bring out the coffin, let the mourners come.

The fact that grief takes so long to resolve is not a sign of inadequacy, but betokens depth of soul.

I cannot write a serious poem without some part of me wanting to make it funny.

How like a prison is my cubicle
Within four walls, I know I am entrapped.
How like a song unsung, unmusical,
My state of mind so far has not been mapped.

Th

https://plantscientist.wordpress.com/2013/04/27/organism-of-the-week-primrose-primula-vulgaris/

Very lovely blog about primroses

“During a field trip in Pembrokeshire as an undergraduate student I spent a couple of days studying primrose flowers. Wild primrose flowers are typically a pale yellow colour like those pictured above but white and pink forms are also seen. There are two forms of flowers, which look almost identical apart from the position of the stigma (female part) and the anthers (male part holding the pollen) in the flower tube in the centre. In “pin” flowers the stigma is positioned at the top of the tube with the anthers positioned halfway down. In “thrum” flowers the stigma is instead positioned halfway down the tube with the anthers at the top.

The two flower types were first described by Charles Darwin in 1862 (1) and he also observed that the pollen produced by the pin flowers was smaller than that of the thrum flowers. He performed a number of crosses (where he took pollen from one flower and placed it on the stigma of another)  between pin-to-pin, thrum-to-thrum, pin-to-thrum, and thrum-to-pin flowers and found that the crosses between the different flower types were more fertile than those between flowers of the same type.”

http://www.skylightto.com/interviews/dr-donald-carveth-guilt/

Do you identify a difference between guilt and shame? 

Yes I do. There are two main types of guilt: The first is punitive guilt, in which “I’m whipping myself”, and that’s almost indistinguishable from shame, which is a narcissistic emotion. In shame, my mind is entirely on myself. We often think of selfishness or narcissism as focusing on “how great I am” but it’s equally narcissistic to be going on all the time about how terrible you are. Shame is self-persecution. It’s a horrible feeling. You beat yourself up, and once in a while, in order to stop beating yourself up, you beat somebody else up- that’s the scapegoat mechanism. When I’m depressed, my superego has me in its crosshairs, but if I can shift someone else into its crosshairs: “That guy over there is the sinner, let’s attack him instead of attacking me.” People can get relief from depression by targeting somebody else. All of this is destructive guilt.

But there’s another kind of guilt altogether, which is reparative guilt: your mind is not on yourself, it’s on the person you’ve injured. The move into reparative guilt is a move out of narcissism. We get our minds off ourselves long enough to actually see the harm we’ve done to others, and to be concerned about them, and to want to do something to make it right.

The example I use is, “I’ve injured someone, and he’s bleeding in the corner. With persecutory guilt or shame, I’m flagellating, I’m such a terrible person.” But that’s useless to the guy who’s bleeding. If I put down the cat-o-nine tails, go get the first aid kit, and start bandaging- that’s reparative guilt.

So guilt can lead to better behaviour. 

Yes. Now I make a distinction between the conscience and the superego. The superego is the inner, moralistic, hanging-judge torturer. Superego is about aggression turned on the self and sometimes on scapegoats.

Conscience is quite separate. Conscience is grounded in love, is grounded in concern. You give love, because you were cared for, and you know you have an obligation to give care back. When you’re out of sync with your conscience, or doing something wrong, Conscience bothers you. By contrast, the superego tortures you- the superego’s attitude is, “OK I caught you in wrongdoing, good. Now I can do what I like to do, which is beat the shit out you.” Conscience doesn’t react that way. The conscience is saddened by the fact that you’re doing wrong. It encourages you to turn around and do right, it calls you to contrition and pulls you to apology and to reparative action, and that is useful guilt.

I like that. Let’s talk about Skylight.

As background: Kyra worked in Tom’s restaurant, and they had an affair while Tom was married to Alice. Kyra was very close to the family, including Alice and Tom’s son, Edward. After six years, Alice discovered the affair, and Kyra abruptly removed herself from their lives. Tom’s relationship with Alice never recovered; Alice became ill and died. Kyra has now moved to a low-income neighbourhood and taken a job teaching very difficult students. Skylight shows us Tom’s and Kyra’s first meeting, 3 years after the end of their affair.

What do you observe in the characters?

My reactions to the play deepened every time I read it. On the first read, you’re very aware of what a bombastic narcissistic character Tom is; and he’s also a symbol, and a critique, of Thatcher’s neoliberal market fundamentalism nonsense. He’s likeable, intelligent, charming, energetic, but he’s easy to identify as a narcissist and a coward. When the wife he’s been unfaithful to is dying, his act of reparation is to throw money, which is nothing to him; he builds her a house, but he can’t face her.

My initial tendency was to see Kyra as a bit of a victim of this narcissistic male, but I think she’s pretty guilty in her own way. She felt fine sleeping with her friend Alice’s husband as long as Alice didn’t know. So now, Kyra’s freezing in this tiny, shoddy apartment, a little bit like she’s sent herself to jail– Tom calls it Siberia. But she would not have to continue in this bread-and-water prison if she came consciously to terms with her guilt. If she did that, she could get over it. So she’s paying a big price for her failure to acknowledge her guilt. And now she’s unconsciously making reparation for her sins by becoming a devoted teacher.

And yet, after Alice discovered the affair, Kyra had 3 years to make true reparations before Alice’s death, but instead, she vanished.

And now, her first words to Tom after a 3-year separation– she doesn’t even say hello- she says, “I’m not guilty.” 

Exactly! She’s making a joke, but as you say, it’s the first thing that comes out of her mouth, which indicates how guilty she really is.

Oh– I wanted to mention this quotation from a Yeats poem at the beginning of the play:

“We had fed the heart on fantasies; the heart’s grown brutal from the fare.”

So here, Kyra and Tom had the illusion that they could help themselves to this fantasy of pleasure and that it wouldn’t hurt anyone as long as they kept it secret. Well that is a total illusion, because ultimately there are no secrets. Even in physics, scientists say everything connects. A butterfly flaps its wings in the Amazon; it affects the weather in Toronto. People have this illusion that there is a hiding place, but it all comes out, and it affects us. Tom and Kyra are maintaining this illusion that their affair is not hurtful, and so…

…the heart has grown brutal as a result.

Repressed guilt and shame are toxic. It’s not the guilt and shame themselves that have a toxic effect, it’s the repression of them, the avoidance of them. So I think it’s a perfect epigraph for the play. Illusions are hard to see through– that’s why we need other people who see us better than we can see ourselves.

(laughing) You should know.

(laughing) Well, it works both ways! One of the great things about doing this work is that the patient sees me as well. When you work with patients intensively for a long period of time, they get to see your weak spots, biases, blind spots… and they tell you about it!

Oh! Can you tell me some of the things they’ve called out?

Sure! One said, “You know, Don, when they called it a Talking Cure, they meant the patient talks!” (laughing)

(laughing) How does that feel?

Well, sometimes… (laughs). But really, I like it, because they’re teaching me something. You know, sometimes I’m clumsy, sometimes I’m arrogant, sometimes I’m wrong, sometimes I’m sleepy, and the patient is going to tell me the ways in which I’m not perfect!

But I’m also getting real gratitude. Sometimes people will thank me with tears in their eyes, and this makes me feel very good. And you don’t get the good without the other side of it. It’s a very deep kind of connectedness with other people, and it’s very gratifying work.

Why did you become an analyst?

When I was younger, I was unhappy, I was self-punishing by getting depressed, by not letting myself be as successful as I otherwise could- and by not being able to write my doctoral dissertation! So I started analysis, because I knew that there was something wrong with me. I had done all of the trendy therapies- this was the sixties- but it was useless. And so, my very first psychiatrist—when I fired him—said, “Consider psychoanalysis.” And I said, “What, they still do that thing with the couch?” But within a matter of weeks I knew this was the therapy for me. I started to change, overcame the writer’s block, wrote the PhD, got the PhD and a tenure-track position, and I started publishing. And as soon as I got tenure, I applied to train as an analyst, and I’ve been practicing ever since. But it started out with a need to deal with my own personal issues, and only then did it turn into a career.

As someone who’s read the play several times, and as someone who has professional insights about its themes- what do you think audiences will take away from Skylight?

I think the audience will be quite moved, and they’ll be shaken. But also entertained. The dialogue is incredibly amusing; some of Tom’s diatribes are hilarious, and Kyra has such a dry, acerbic wit- this is a play that should really be enjoyed. But it’s going to shake people as well.

http://www.see-a-voice.org/marketing-ad/effective-communication/readability/

Readability

The average reading age of the UK population is 9 years – that is, they have achieved the reading ability normally expected of a 9 year old.
The Guardian has a reading age of 14 and the Sun has a reading age of 8.

Considering the readability of your copy will benefit many people, including blind and partially sighted people.

This is an example of a possible paragraph written for the access page of a brochure:

At every performance where audio description is provided, there is also an opportunity for a touch tour of the stage and set. Touch tours give visually impaired patrons an opportunity to familiarise themselves with the set and costumes before the show to enhance their enjoyment of the production.

This sample has a reading age of 24 and, therefore, it excludes the vast majority of its intended readers.

Here is an alternate version of the copy:

There will be a touch tour before every audio described performance. This gives you the chance get to know the set and costumes. Patrons tell us this means they enjoy the show more.

It now has a reading age of 10. All we’ve done is use shorter sentences and shorter, everyday words.

On the DOWNLOADS page you can print out instructions on how to calculate the reading age of a piece of text using the FOG INDEX or a tool within Microsoft WORD.

Scannable copy

One way of improving readability for everyone is to create scannable copy. This makes it easy for people to go quickly to the information they are interested in.

Take a look at the extracts overleaf from The Sun and The Guardian on 25 August 2008. Which one is easiest to scan and why?

What you can do …

• Use bold to take the reader to key words.

• Use meaningful subheadings (explain what’s in it for them).

I found your diary with  a date to meet
A friend  you loved and cherished all these years
But life itself made that a  raw, cold cheat
For when it came you were no longer here.

I admired your life force and your wit
The act, illusion, call it what we must.
You did not hurry into death’s cold pit
Nor where you eager to  break down into dust

Yet you did not fight  the coming freeze
Like a cat that senses its own end
No longer could  you speak, yet  lay at ease
Until the curtain’s calm and kind descent

On New Year’s  Day two thousand and fifteen
We  did not know that this was our last scene

Shall I miss the journeys that we made
Up sheer cliffs and through deep muddy yards
Chased by  geese and then in heather laid?
I cannot catch you now, it is too far.

You cleaned my boots back in the cottage sweet
On the bed, you covered  me in  coats
Tenderly you stroked my crooked feet
And hot and sugared tea you once more brought

A dog stopped by and held out its clean paw
It shook your hand and gazed with amber eyes
Remote and cold, the Hartland Cliffs we saw
Where have you got to now, my love, disguised?

Danger and delight then drew us on
I cannot find your face, where have you gone?

Hereto I come to view a voiceless ghost;
Whither, O whither will its whim now draw me?
Up the cliff, down, till I’m lonely, lost,
And the unseen waters’ ejaculations awe me. the sound of the sea
Where you will next be there’s no knowing,
Facing round about me everywhere,
With your nut-coloured hair,
And gray eyes, and rose-flush coming and going. Emma’s rose pink cheeks
Yes: I have re-entered your olden haunts at last; the places where you often used to go
Through the years, through the dead scenes I have tracked you;
What have you now found to say of our past –
Viewed across the dark space wherein I have lacked you?
Summer gave us sweets, but autumn wrought division?
Things were not lastly as firstly well
With us twain, you tell? twain – two
But all’s closed now, despite Time’s derision. derision – mocking
I see what you are doing: you are leading me on
To the spots we knew when we haunted here together, often used to go
The waterfall, above which the mist-bow shone
At the then fair hour in the then fair weather,
And the cave just under, with a voice still so hollow
That it seems to call out to me from forty years ago,
When you were all aglow,
And not the thin ghost that I now frailly follow!
Ignorant of what there is flitting here to see, flitting – moving quickly from place to place
The waked birds preen and the seals flop lazily, preen – clean themselves, arrange their feathers
Soon you will have, Dear, to vanish from me, ghosts are said to vanish at daybreak
For the stars close their shutters and the dawn whitens hazily.
Trust me, I mind not, though Life lours, lours – looks gloomy
The bringing me here; nay, bring me here again!
I am just the same as when
Our days were a joy, and our paths through flowers.

From Valediction:

“In this exile called old age
I live between nostalgia and rage.
This is the land of fools and fear.
Thanks be. I’m lucky to be here.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/11127571/Dannie-Abse-his-greatest-poems.html

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2005/jan/27/poetry.schools

“Finally, the acid test: now the process is over, will the students involved be hooked on poetry? “I think so,” Summers says, thoughtfully. “I’m not sure that it’ll have made them into natural-born purchasers of every poetry collection that comes out – I wouldn’t blame them if it hadn’t – but I certainly think it made them see that there is a much bigger world of poetry out there than they’d realised. The generic curse of the way poetry is delivered at secondary level these days is that it’s about appreciation, not readership. The situation these kids found themselves in – three days to read with no pressure on them apart from having to make a few cups of coffee – was a privilege, a luxury. And I don’t think it’s one they’ll forget.” Morrissey agrees: “I think the students felt quite” – she hesitates – “liberated, in a way, by the fact that this was primarily an exercise in enthusiasm, not criticism. There was a power in going off the curriculum and not having to constantly consider and quantify that they responded to. It was really fresh. Hopefully the readers will feel that, too.”

It looks as though they do. A copy of Fifty Strong has been sent out to every secondary school and sixth form college in the UK, and so far the responses have been resoundingly positive. Paul Summers thinks he knows why. “Without them being pushed, they covered everything – from domestic violence to bloody war in the former Yugoslavia to broken hearts and death,” he says “That pretty much sums it up.”

What our teenage reviewers thought

‘A lively and absorbing collection’

There’s a poem for every young person to relate to in Fifty Strong. This mature selection conveys powerful emotions while covering a broad range of topics including love, death, war and adoption. I particularly liked the use of poems from other languages and cultures and found it interesting to see them written in their original to

The advantage of having a poetry anthology selected by teenagers for teenagers is that all the poems reflect aspects of adolescent life. It ensures that the anthology includes not only the obviously teenage poems that deal with unrequited love, betrayal, and loneliness, but also poems that address important wider issues “

Dear All

I was thinking last night that I should give some advice to women about to marry.
Be sure you know your fiancee’s name before you get married.Then put into your phone or address book.Then if you feel so inclined, you can shout it when you make love.Maybe not on your honeymoon as a hotel is not very private.But when you get home it will be satisfying to scream” Sigmund” at midnight unless you are asleep.
Find out how much money you have coming in and decide to spend it as fast as you can as that will spur him on to earn even more.You can still work but why not  retrain as a therapist as  you can share your horror stories with your husband
Psychoanalysts earn a lot but may have to start work at 4 am to fit in  people who want to come before work
When you have a baby, teach your husband how to bottle feed so if he does get up at 4 am he can feed the baby while he listens to his first patient.Then he can write a book about how helpful his patient found this.Or not.
See things in a different way.Marriage is good for you but only if you have achieved object constancy.I have not done so myself so I am never sure if my husband is the same man I married.He seems less a particle and more like a wave as he never keeps still.I find him somewhat annoying in bed.
That reminds me we need a new mattress as not the centre is higher than the sides which means I roll off and so does he.Not to mention our cat Felicity and her 3 kittens.They are very bold as they don’t leave the room when we embrace and also they follow me into the bathroom too.As they don’t understand English I can’t make them go away.I  will not slap them or curse.I am already rather wicked.
I can’t write it here but I am a spy.For whom I have no idea.I keep a journal about everyone in this street and their odd behaviour.I am sure someone will buy it off me soon
I can smell the cloves in my bread and butter pudding.So I will continue later~Cheery bye
Kristy

From  desert sands to burning bush;
Moses  on Mount Horeb learned
The ten commandments ,bold in truth

By Canvey Island, waters rush.
The Hasidic from East London turn
No  desert sands nor burning bush

There are reasons, I’m bemused.
Will God be with the tidal turn?
The ten commandments, hauled in truth

In their memory of  Negev
For  hot spaces they may yearn;
Ache  for sand and burning bush

Sand a-plenty they will have.
On Canvey Isle, their innards churn.
The little children tease with love

Over Canvey, cherubs blush
For they too  have felt the pain,
Ache  for sun and burning bush

Now joyous children freely play
Who would think they’d come this way?
By Canvey Isle,  Thames’ waters rush.
The Lord transplants the Burning Bush.

https://www.theguardian.com/global/2017/oct/08/shalom-canvey-island-haredi-jews-moving-to-essex?CMP=share_btn_link

They love the peace and being by the sea.The locals seem very welcoming as many of them were from East and NE London.After the war the government built new houses there.There is a railway station so commuting is easy

The new Messiah will fly on a great horse
A burning stallion arched in perfect grace
As he crosses Europe he perceives
The scattered remnants of his fellow Jews

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/oct/08/the-story-of-the-jews-belonging-1492-1900-review-simon-schama-fight-to-fit-in

“The first volume of Simon Schama’s mammoth undertaking, The Story of the Jews, ended two and a half thousand years after it began, with the Spanish Inquisition and the expulsion of Jews from Iberia. The second volume, entitled, with more than a smidgen of irony, Belonging, begins in the Venice ghetto, where many victims of that expulsion found uneasy refuge.

Some had fled from Portugal, where, during the Easter of 1506, about 2,000 “New Christians” (Jews who had been forced to convert) were slaughtered in three days. “The ostensible cause,” writes Schama, “was a vocal comment made by a New Christian in church to the effect that a miraculous illumination on the face of the Saviour on the cross might have been a mere effect of candlelight.”

That incident warrants only passing mention, but it’s a shocking reminder of just how vulnerable Jews have been in Europe over many centuries.

Belonging, which covers the period from 1492 to 1900, is concerned with the Jewish search for security and the efforts – both coerced and voluntary – at assimilation in Europe (there are brief excursions to other settlements, in America, and as far off as China).

Jews have traditionally been caught in a double bind: not trusted as a distinct minority, and trusted even less when they attempt to adopt the majority culture/religion.

It’s a position that has led to repeated cycles of persecution, expulsion, confinement and a ceaseless hankering to be accepted. That, in essence, is the story of the Jews and Schama lays it out in rich, complex and fascinating detail.

Although this is an ambitious doorstop of a book, Schama is not interested in history writ large. His signature method is to recount the plight of individuals against the swirling backdrop of events. It’s a high-wire approach that can leave the reader wondering if the extended anecdotes – a tragic conman in 16th-century Venice, rumours of a Jewish sex cult in 18th-century Moldova – will ever reach the firm ground of historical import.

I am here, in this air, walking through the bodies
Of the ghosts who still converse, read  the news and eat
I walk straight through  them, their life goes on
Am I a ghost or is it them?
And the two old ladies who lived here
The spaces between the particles
Inside the particles
Are where such ghosts may live
So close, yet so infinitely distant,
From the other people on  the earth
I see you but it is a film
It’s running backwards
So we might wave as we cross over
Or are we looking the other way?
Looping around we travel in this funfair of novel life
On the big dipper, we fly off  like freed  flowers
Embellishing the air with faint colour as we leave a trace behind

Dear all
Well at this rate, I’ll not be finished with this until next year so I am sending another instalment.The problem is, I have become intoxicated by musing on the difference between evocation and explanation.I do too much of the latter and not enough of the former.However, I apologise as I know you are not likely to care about such things.Well, that’s unkind of me to assume you are all intellectually  feeble, as it were.After all, you have all those children to worry about.
Unfortunately, I have not got grandchildren at Cambridge to boast about although my mother’s cousin was once the Head of Preston Technical College which is now part of a University.And my mother did go to a Secondary Grammar School which was hard to get into then as it was fee paying and only gave one scholarship a year.She was very bright
My one and only son has emigrated to Transylvania as Brexit made him ill.Or was it Australia? Anyway he emails me every week and I see his wife is very tanned so maybe they are in Sydney , after all.
I feel so disappointed as I wished him to be within easy reach.However, he does not feel the same way as I do
.An over-scrupulous, over-articulate, man-mad she-wolf was just one label he liked to repeat.But I still adore him.My daughter is more attuned to me and we speak on the phone every five years or so.She lives next door so at least I see her through the window.She must be ambivalent about me.
My intellectual knowledge is no help with such difficult problems.A pity my husband was always busy practising psychoanalysis and never had time for me.I did get into one of his books  under other names.”Difficult Doris” and ” Alice and the Paranoid-Wits-Sold position ” or something similar
When we used to enjoy sex, he never mentioned that position to me once.I would have been happy to do anything he fancied except speak to him.He said he wished I would call out his name instead of screaming like a cat having a nightmare.
I could not tell him I had forgotten his name and I was even unsure if he was the  same man I had married, but politeness restrained me.
After all, another man would have been pretty similar in his needs.So why bother asking for more information.He was earning a lot of money so that was ok.I had a mock fur coat and two real plastic handbags.And three pairs of odd shoes.
Well, I am afraid I have eaten  my bread and butter pudding so I must go and get some more.
I hope you have a great Jewish, Muslim,post-Christian and Atheistic New Year whenever it comes.I can’t remember all that anymore.Every day is new to me.
Cheers,Kristy