Our deepest need is for real dialogue

Our deepest need is for a dialogue
Without raised voices or the wish to  wound
And we may find this on a  simple blog.

Some Shakespeare plays have got their own prologue.
And in the plays, we see the world alround.
Our deepest need is for real dialogue

Some comments one would not say to a dog.
The silence of the net makes judgements  fume
And we may find this on a  simple blog.

Barbaric people wish to hang  and flog.
Please, God, let  pity  come  down soon
All  peoples need a  trusted dialogue

At times, tested, we are caught by fog.
The instruments of angels  pierce  our gloom
And we read /write this on a  simple blog.

The sky is brighter , summer is assumed.
Share the earth with stars and sun and moon.
Our kindest wish  is for a dialogue
In  which  we   find the sacredness of love

Therefore eye is

I write like this when I feel blue.It endears me up.
She was wearing cropped, ripped jeans and, showed black ankle eyes therefore I is.
She was swearing, tripped Jean and eyed her ankles.They were created that way
She wore pop-ups under her long skirt to hide her  conformities
I  like knee eyes myself.Tights prevent  certain visions
Did you have to be a spectacle? I  love contacts, myself.
With this fling, I thee bed.Get on with it and make me a sinner.
Do you take this man?If not, I shall.
Where do you take the woman after that?
She was horrid for 50 years.She’s not bred yet,
Her husband was omnipotent.He built and erected malefactions.
What did she glue?
When we got divorced, he took the leg-over and I got the Leggo set.
One man is much like another  when they bark.They never speak Dutch to me  but that’s because I type silently
Yes, I committed adultery so I could make my Easter Depression last longer.First I had to get married.That was the hard part.After that it got easier and easier.Now I lie down all day.I read Bakhin and smile complacently
.

 

I am because WE are.

 

Fritillaria-tortifolia2017-2https://aeon.co/ideas/descartes-was-wrong-a-person-is-a-person-through-other-persons

“I am because we are, and because we are I am”

“According to Ubuntu philosophy, which has its origins in ancient Africa, a newborn baby is not a person. People are born without ‘ena’, or selfhood, and instead, must acquire it through interactions and experiences over time. So the ‘self’/‘other’ distinction that’s axiomatic in Western philosophy is much blurrier in Ubuntu thought. As the Kenyan-born philosopher John Mbiti put it in African Religions and Philosophy (1975): ‘I am because we are, and since we are, therefore I am.’

We know from everyday experience that a person is partly forged in the crucible of community. Relationships inform self-understanding. Who I am depends on many ‘others’: my family, my friends, my culture, my work colleagues. The self I take grocery shopping, say, differs in her actions and behaviours from the self that talks to my PhD supervisor. Even my most private and personal reflections are entangled with the perspectives and voices of different people, be it those who agree with me, those who criticise, or those who praise me.

Yet the notion of a fluctuating and ambiguous self can be disconcerting. We can chalk up this discomfort, in large part, to René Descartes. The 17th-century French philosopher believed that a human being was essentially self-contained and self-sufficient; an inherently rational, mind-bound subject, who ought to encounter the world outside her head with scepticism. While Descartes didn’t single-handedly create the modern mind, he went a long way towards defining its contours.”

 

Why modern poets don’t write in form [much]

Fritillaria-tortifolia2017-1

 

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/harriet/2007/11/why-no-one-wants-to-be-a-new-formalist/

 

“If I have to belabelledd, I myself prefer the term “retro-formalist”, which at least sounds vaguely cool, like wearing vintage clothing and listening to vinyl, something so square it’s hip.
So what is NF? Just who ARE these embarrassing people? British poets who work in form and meter are apparently just being… British (that Modernism stuff was all very American and Continental after all), i.e., old formalists. New Formalists have to be American for some reason. Is it people who have studied with Yvor Winters? People who returned to form and painfully relearned prosody from manuals after an apostasy in free verse? People who write screeds against a Modernism that was actually better grounded in craft and tradition than most working poets today? People who write exclusively in form? People who capitalize their lines? People who have published in a formal journal or attended West Chester, a craft-focused conference in Pennsylvania (where, yes, I have had the opportunity of both taking and teaching classes)?
Glibness aside, though, do I feel belligerent against free verse? No, I admire good free verse, I wish I wrote it better. Tennis without a net has its own beauties and choreography. But I write best (as more than one editor has pointed out to me when I tried to sneak in some free verse in a submission) when I write against the constraint and pressures of form–any constraint, really, be it syllabic, repetend, stanzaic, metrical, rhyme-schemed. I write… freer that way.”

I see the children smile and smile and peer.

The sensuous pleasure of warm air on skin
For three years past, I’ve let no solace near.
Summer’s here,  birds chirp, begin again.

I feel, at last, some joy erupt within.
I have heard the music  of my fear
No sensuous pleasure of warm air on skin

 

To not appreciate this earth may be a sin
I have missed the voice of him, so dear.
Summer’s here,  birds chirp, begin again.

Who could understand my time in hell but him?
Hard to dream of new love without fear.
The sensuous pleasure of  his hand, my skin

I beg him to return, I’ve served my time.
But he cannot reply, my heart is seared.
Summer’s here,  birds chirp, begin again.

 

I see the children smile and smile and peer.
As I sing,  my voice is dark and clear.
The   birth and message  of  the song risen
Says summer’s  come, I shall begin again.

 

Starting with the sonnet form

The first line of Gray’s Elegy has the right meter.for a sonnet.

“The curfew tolls the knell of parting day.”

So you must write a line to that music:

The clouds rise up and race across the sky

for example; then you need a second line.I find these two lines must be interesting.emotional , deep or symbolic.After that, the structure determines to some extent how you can develop your poem…Fourteen lines according to the pattern below.

ABAB CDCD EFEF GG

Sonnets are usually serious but it is possible to write a humorous one.Historically it was the metaphysical poets who wrote this way about love and death…John Donne is one of them.He wrote the famous poem

No man is an island

/Brightness
Eve's temptation

Sonnet on writing a poem

Poetry is the art of shaping words

The structure contributes to make a whole.

And writing sonnets is not just for us nerds.

Creating structures helps to create our souls.

Yet many folks are frightened by the risk

Of imperfection, criticism and pain.

But for myself, I love this frightening task.

So gaily I sit down to write again.

Though what I write may not be alpha plus.

The chance to share my feelings lures me on.

And when I travel on a London bus

I write a note before my thoughts are gone

We each can be creative in  some way

And find our happiness in being gay

On E.E.Cummings

How to Neutralize Haters: E.E. Cummings, Creative Courage, and the Importance of Protecting the Artist’s Right to Challenge the Status Quo

“The Artist is no other than he who unlearns what he has learned, in order to know himself,” young E.E. Cummings (October 14, 1894–September 3, 1962) wrote in his beautiful essay on what it really means to be an artist. He lived this tenet every day, on every line, and spent his entire career defending the basic creative freedom to dismantle the accepted order, the way things have always been done, in order to get to the heart of truth and beauty.

 

 

Discussion or dialogue

2012-05-12-10-31-13-1

 

Legendary Physicist David Bohm on the Paradox of Communication, the Crucial Difference Between Discussion and Dialogue, and What Is Keeping Us from Listening to One Another

 

Legendary Physicist David Bohm on the Paradox of Communication, the Crucial Difference Between Discussion and Dialogue, and What Is Keeping Us from Listening to One Another

“Words,” Ursula K. Le Guin wrote in her abiding meditation on the magic of real human communication, “transform both speaker and hearer; they feed energy back and forth and amplify it. They feed understanding or emotion back and forth and amplify it.” But what happens in a cultural ecosystem where the hearer has gone extinct and the speaker gone rampant? Where do transformation and understanding go?

What made, for instance, James Baldwin and Margaret Mead’s superb 1970 dialogue about race and identity so powerful and so enduringly insightful is precisely the fact that it was a dialogue — not the ping-pong of opinions and co-reactivity that passes for dialogue today, but a commitment to mutual contemplation of viewpoints and considered response. That commitment is the reason why they were able to address questions we continue to confront with tenfold more depth and nuance than we are capable of today. And the dearth of this commitment in our present culture is the reason why we continue to find ourselves sundered by confrontation and paralyzed by the divisiveness of “us vs. them” narratives. “To bother to engage with problematic culture, and problematic people within that culture, is an act of love,” wrote the poet Elizabeth Alexander in contemplating power and possibility. Krista Tippett calls such engagement generous listening. And yet so much of our communication today is defined by a rather ungenerous unwillingness to listen coupled with a compulsion to speak.

The most perennially insightful and helpful remedy for this warping of communication I’ve ever encountered comes from the legendary physicist David Bohm (December 20, 1917–October 27, 1992) in On Dialogue (public library) — a slim, potent collection of Bohm’s essays and lectures from the 1970s and 1980s, exploring the alchemy of human communication, what is keeping us from listening to one another, and how we can transcend those barriers to mutual understanding.

davidbohm

Decades before the social web as we know it and long before Rebecca Solnit came to lament how our modern noncommunication is changing our experience of solitude and communion, Bohm cautions:

In spite of this worldwide system of linkages, there is, at this very moment, a general feeling that communication is breaking down everywhere, on an unparalleled scale… What appears [in the media] is generally at best a collection of trivial and almost unrelated fragments, while at worst, it can often be a really harmful source of confusion and misinformation.

He terms this “the problem of communication” and writes:

Different groups … are not actually able to listen to each other. As a result, the very attempt to improve communication leads frequently to yet more confusion, and the consequent sense of frustration inclines people ever further toward aggression and violence, rather than to

Speaking and listening

SouthportBeach-1965[640x480

 

Erich Fromm’s 6 Rules of Listening: The Great Humanistic Philosopher and Psychologist on the Art of Unselfish Understanding

 

An experience makes its appearance only when it is being said,” wrote Hannah Arendt in reflecting on how language confers reality upon existence. “And unless it is said it is, so to speak, non-existent.” But if an experience is spoken yet unheard, half of its reality is severed and a certain essential harmony is breached. The great physicist David Bohm knew this: “If we are to live in harmony with ourselves and with nature,” he wrote in his excellent and timely treatise on the paradox of communication, “we need to be able to communicate freely in a creative movement in which no one permanently holds to or otherwise defends his own ideas.”

If we don’t trust, suspicion haunts our view

What are those brown objects in the bowl?
The salad green is easier to see.
Are they meat or are they Dover’s soul?

They’re not black so they cannot be coal
They don’t look like  cherries heavenly
What are those brown objects in the bowl?

 

Underneath the Castle in a hole
A room was made as World War strategy
Where  our government could hide if Hitler called,

To eat to please our mother is a goal
If we don’t trust, suspicion spoils our view
Of  those dark objects in the salad bowl

 

My nephew picks them up, they are not moles
They’re salad spoons of wood, auspiciously.
They look neat, they are not dead brown wholes

 

When we  ingest  food we need to be
Trusting of the one who made the tea.
What are those two brown objects in the bowl?
Are they meat or are they two lost souls?

To begin with,” said the Cat, “a dog’s not mad. You grant that?” I suppose so, said Alice

DryS_Peacock

Photo by Mike Flemming 2017 copyright

“And how do you know that you’re mad? “To begin with,” said the Cat, “a dog’s not mad. You grant that?” I suppose so, said Alice. “Well then,” the Cat went on, “you see a dog growls when it’s angry, and wags it’s tail when it’s pleased. Now I growl when I’m pleased, and wag my tail when I’m angry. Therefore I’m mad.”
― Lewis Carroll, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass

Watching televisions is not hard

 

Watching televisions is not hard

They can’t walk.

Talk ok and take your views

Of the News.

Flat ones can’t have a plant on top

alongside the wooden birds

I preferred

As I say, I keep my eye on it.

Watch it secretly when no-one is here

Or near

I’m waiting for it to speak its real words.

Or to ask me a question.

Who are you?

Why do you watch me?

Have you no shame?

If a television could speak

We wouldn’t be able to understand what’s sad about it

Their sorry faces traumatised, undone

The ghosts of failures past make tears   flow down
They run inside the wrinkles of the skin
The faces of the old and savaged ones.

 

The child teased for her foreign accent frowns.
Does she have the strength of mind within?
The ghost of failure now makes tears   flow down

 

We thought the old were wiser, never conned.
Yet we ourselves have thinner skin.
Our faces old and ravaged, tortured ones.

 

For the poor in money, loss abounds
They  blame themselves, they did not  ever win
The ghost of failure past makes tears   flow down

The poor in spirit to their Lord will run
Is this world of terror caused by sin?
Their   sorry faces traumatised, undone

The crucifix will be uncrossed again.
The holocaust in nuclear fires may come
The  salt of failure’s cost make tears  run on
The faces of the living, savaged ones.

A civil muse

To  the prospect of her husband’s death, resigned
Sad and anxious were her feelings at the news.
When he was cured, her heart was pleased yet pained.

Anger with  him sent her half insane
A paradox since she was not to lose.
To  the prospect of  his death,  she’d been resigned

Illogical, she felt he was to blame.
Reality  was hard and lonely  from her view
When he was cured,  the doctors she disdained

The doctors did not understand what’s plain-
That changing all our notions  makes us blue
To  the knowledge of  his death,  she’d been resigned

When bad news turns to good we ‘re redesigned
Our  inner  symbols slowly are made new
When he was healed, her cup filled up with pain.

What poetry  survives a civil muse?
What  love  such healing can, surprised, endure
To  the prospect of her husband’s  loss resigned
By his cure, her art was countersigned.

 

 

Why not install your own hinterland?

Repairing your looks  for publicity
How to  strangle bad reviewers.
How to startle a  rude crook
Freedom of  Swedes and Turnips in any society.
Writer’s block.The news and the fuse
Why not install your own hinterland?
How to get some free rhymes and white spirits
Dried up? Write a hymn prune.
Sad? Dance the night away.

For sale

1.Inflatable duvet suitable for covering uncountably many non-algebraic numbers of people.
2.Cover for inflatable duvet washable in infinite large washing machine at 30 degrees{Oxon}
3.Bed big enough for uncountably many unaccountable people with degrees of little use.
4 Very long,unmeasurable bolster with pure silk cover.Dry clean only.
5.Chastity belts for uncountably many large and small paradoxical ladies
6 Bromides in infinitely many doses [Aleph null] for all men who have not got diabetes.
7 An infinitely, uncountably large number of glucose meters and pins to prick your finger and check your blood sugar
8.A teapot which boils using the body heat of an infinite number of men and women while they make love.
9 A huge number of china mugs [ not even tried counting]
10 Fridge with an ininitely large bottle of milk in it plus tea bags of same order of magnitude.
11.Aleph one boxes of silver teaspoons.Free to first persone who understands the meaning of life.

The golden apple’s foreign, make it cry

The sun owns us, it made the acers bright.
We flaunted a beech tree, a small bonsai
How I love the play, a tragedy, oh, quite.

 

When I croaked today I saw the light!
I dream of nothing and I rarely wonder why.
The gambling verbs have made the poets trite
.

Gone is winter with its widow’s might
Off, grey rod and take your Grecian pi.
How I love aught held with feigned delight

I saw a child write with her ink so white
I said, the paper’s black.do you know why?
The golden apple’s foreign, make it cry

My husband’s gone to bed, he’s dynamite.
Except he falls asleep when I pass by
My broad elastic band snaps in delight

I am Jesus, I am foreign.I’m not white
I may seem dead but I am God’s own spy
The silver swan’s song had a bitter note

Would a Wittgenstein interpret lies?
Will my nightie be ok if I should die?
The sun scents hours, we smile at cows so white.
How I love these sheep with green and golden eyes.

 

 

Wear an orange coat in December

 

If you are happy to wear strange colours that most of us are not then  the Sales will satisfy your lust for clothes of high quality

1.Buy a wool coat for only £79 from a top make.Why?
Because it is ORANGE!
1b.Enter an old-fashioned religious order
2.Buy one ball of mohair and knit yourself a hat.Don’t  make it red or it will CLASH with the orange coat.
3.Knit yourself a Mobius strip neck warmer in merino wool.I invented it but now it’s in fashion
4 Wear men’s woollen vests–  a good reason to get married.Check the vest first before you  get married
5.Wear two of everything if you are thin enough not to appear  gigantic
2 Vests, 2 pairs pants.2 prs tights, etc. BUT Not 2 pairs of  JEANS.You won’t be able to walk.Ditto shoes!
Drawback: twice as much washing.
Advantage: Save money on central heating.
6.Move to  hotter country.Remember though you will be a FOREIGNER then.
So maybe not a European country?Remember ,no NHS.Remember Brexit?
7 Wear 2 nightgowns
8 Put a fleece sleeping bag between your sheets.Leave  the unzipped side on the side where you exit the bed  n the middle of the night.
9 Avoid birth control devices and be chaste.Get your partner to sleep in another fleece bag.That will make it hard for him to get near you.Don’t wrestle unless your bed is very big.You might  fall off and what would the  Fire Brigade think?
10 Do a lot of cleaning and vacuuming instead of watching TV.. it gets one warm and the room clean too.
11 Go for a run.
12 Stay in bed for 3 months till meteorological spring arrives.

In a boat on living water

  • My printer ,oh what Envy;
    My Chromebook  lusts for Denby
    The seven deadly sins have come to town.
    I  guess they might be catching
    Pride and lust exacting
    So in these sins humanity might drown.
    We suffer the temptation
    Lust besets the Nation.
    Brides demand the most expensive gown.
    So sail away  or saunter
    In a boat on living water
    That will take away your tension and your frown….
    For advertisers know us
    So then they want to show us.
    How to make a payment they call down

 

In infinite dreams

Must  a bed be of infinite size
To contain aleph-null of your eyes?
I  thrash out this theme
In infinite dreams
Call it a surd to the wise.

I can’t take a date with a man
As I am counting  these sheets , aleph-one
Hercules  had it soft
In spite of his task
I  am old but have hardly begun

An infinite number of folk under a duvet?

IMG_0067.JPG

Topology, a branch of mathematics, is sometimes called rubber sheet geometry.It’s a sad world when mathematicians have to study the sheets of those of us who have leaky bladders.
However, if Tracy Emin’s bed is a work of art it extends the possibilities for scientists and mathematicians.And this needed because with all academics having to publish very frequently they might run out of topics.
So we might have a study of duvets and the different shapes they might assume when they are covering just one person, two people, three people and, since we are mathematicians, we could study their shapes when covering an infinite number of people.
Alternatively how about the effect of one person being covered by an infinite number of duvets?
Would it be aleph-null the infinity of the rational numbers or aleph 0ne [the infinity of the real numbers]?
Aleph one is the bigger of the two ..
Aleph is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet… and it is used because mathematicians already have used up the Greek alphabet.
So now we use the Hebrew one which is slightly different.
If you learned calculus you will recall all those delta x’s and delta y’s.
This makes me think calculus is part of geomorphology and I do believe that geomorphology which studies the surface of the earth is linked to the love and study of the mother’s face and body by human infants.
So calculus is linked to the studied love of babies.Can it be that if you had a disturbed infancy you will find mathematics very hard? Plastic geometry and plastic surgery will be dealt with later but obviously again it is linked to love or hate of the body though our bodies are not usually made from plastic but who knows the future?

In deep water, luminous as fog

If I should live again, I’d be a  frog
For tadpoles insubstantial  cause no fright
Yet they change but not upon my blog

They change their being, leap up from the bog
As  bread is changed by holy, priestly rites,
If I should live again, I’d be a  frog

In  deep water,  luminous as fog,
The frogs live on the edge of human sight
Yes they  croak but not  till we’re in bed

As lovers lie  down naked on their rug
They tempt the frog, the adder, the termite
Then  they rage upon the death of God

As the  wheel  turns, see, it drips with blood
The human race is ground up, we’re a blight
Yes,  someone, somewhere, once  did something good

Oh dark, oh grey, oh where is the new light?
Seems like the  frogs, the Lord leapt out of sight
If I should live again, I’d be  your  god
I’d save the world by turning  us to frogs.

Acceptance is Job’s answer,I believe.

We cannot understand   the sufferings of man
The holocaust, the murder of the Dove.
The grasp for ill,  refusal of the good.
The will to power,  and what we might become.

 

Where are the saints in their communion?
Where is God, they say he’s total love?
We cannot understand   the sufferings of man
The holocaust, the murder of the Dove.

 

We need  to see in order to become.
There is light inside, below, above.
The sun shines through transparent  new red leaves
Acceptance is Job’s answer,I believe.
We can’t explain  the sufferings of man

 

Their bodies kill the sacred space of love

The body is the sacred space of love
Created by the fusing of two cells.
Within the holy body  spirit  dwells,
God ‘s inside; God is not high above.

In Cohen’s song, God is the holy dove.
In the Bible, different symbols tell.
The fiery bush, the still small voice speaks love
To me and you, the fusion of two selves.

The world needs no  dark demons hand in glove
We  perform  our evil very well,
Of salvation, who are we to tell?
We gas children; see, the torture lives.
Their bodies kill the sacred space of love

I won’t forget the tender joy of all we had

I won’t forget the tender  joy of  all we  had
The good need not be lost when lovers part.
You needed space so take it and be glad.

Because I love you, I shall  now be  sad
But I won’t let it stab me in  the heart
I won’t forget the joy of what we had.

With your loving words , I once was clad
Now naked to the winds, I must  depart
If you need space then take it and be glad.

The only constant love is that of God
No Eros is He with his arrowed darts
Do not destroy the joy of all we had.

On these forlorn tracks, I have  once trod
In my mind, I search for  ragged  charts
If you need space then go and speak to God.

I have my maps and now  the leaving starts
With tenderness, farewell my dearest heart.
You are lonesome  in your soul forever sad
If you need space then  be off ,I’ll be glad.