Try this article if that link above is no good
I have now got the book “What is called thinking” by Martin Heidegger despite my qualms about his political history.I know he wrote it in German and hence a translation may give a different meaning so maybe my thoughts are not sensible….and my first thoughts are………….. it is fascinating title.He is looking at an activity that we humans do.He is asking what it is we do when we say we think.So before I read it I am putting a few reflections.Thinking means standing back,waiting and reflecting.Often we do things because our parents did or our friends.Then sometimes we wonder about our life,we pause and try to examine how we are living.Or we could be solving an intellectual problem.Some things like quadratic equations can be solved by a formula.And many people are happy just to perform this rote activity But even though its math,you are not thinking when you do that.And I have an intuition that we avoid thinking much of the time because we step outside our automatic patterns.I once read an article that says depression comes on us when we face a problem at the unconscious level.The tiredness,slowness and painful feelings make us withdraw and that gives our minds time to reflect.So there must also be unconscious thinking.Maybe that other mind uses images as in dreams.And we all know that “sleeping” on a problem often produces a solution.Thinking may not be verbal all of the time.And we must have something to think about.We must be participating in the world of Others.Language comes via others.We are part of a society…at first just a few family members.But our tongue is shared with many people.And when we think in words,those words came before us and go on after us.
Pretty little mice and other things
Maurice Saatchi talks about his wife Josephine Hart
This is a very beautiful story.I only just found out the Saatchis are Jewish and were born in Iraq.Like nearly all the Jews there they had to flee…and they’d been there 2,000 years .I knew one myself who was an economist.Josephine Hart did a lot to encourage enjoyment of poetry and she also wrote novels.The Saatchis are famous for their advertising agency….
A magical photograph
I am unable to find what I wanted to about Bion and thinking but I found something else
from which I copied a quote
It is too often forgotten that the gift of speech, so centrally employed, has been elaborated as much
for the purpose of concealing thought by dissimulation and lying as for the purpose of elucidating
and communicating thought. – Wilfred Bion
I found this whilst looking for something else but it look interesting to a student of human nature.
Very short and funny
“You can cure me, right?”
The psychiatrist pretended to polish her glasses.
“It’ll take time. Patience. Perseverance. But yes, I think I can cure you. You haven’t lapsed a single time since you sat down on that sofa for example. That tells me there is hope.”
The patient expressed his gratitude through a subtle tear rolling from his eye and – later – by writing a big fat check for twelve more sessions at doctor Monroe’s.
“So what was his problem?” her secretary asked.
“You remember that leaflet about protecting the bees the government stuffed into every mailbox in town not that long ago?”
“Bee a friend.”
“You recall the title, hey?”
“It’s a nice pun.”
“Well, apparently he’s the guy that wrote it. Big shot copywriter. Great at witty puns. Trouble is, he can’t stop punning anymore. Every time he hears the word bee or honey or even pollen…
View original post 134 more words
See this
As I teach Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics (along with the thought of Epicurus and Epictetus), I’m struck by just how much our ethical discourse has changed. This is attested to by what is absent in these discourses as much as by what is present. What’s so striking in Aristotle, is that the question of ethics is one of eudaimonia, happiness, or human flourishing. How ought we live our lives in order to attain human flourishing or happiness, he asks? Similarly, in the case of the Epicureans and stoics, the question is one of ataraxia, peace of mind, or tranquility. For these thinkers there is a clear telos to ethical thought and action: happiness and tranquility.
Such questions seem thoroughly absent from the ethical thought of the last couple hundred years. Ethics instead seems to become a question of how to determine the rules that should govern behavior and…
View original post 872 more words
Doris Lessing interviewed If you are a feminist must you dislike men?
“What is called thinking” by Heidegger
This seems a good introduction to the book and to discussing thinking in our era
Short Extract from the article
Heidegger refers to Nietzsche’s diagnosis of our age as a time of nihilism: “The wasteland grows.” If it is Being that most calls for thought, what most calls to be thought about in our age is the forgetting or withdrawal of Being. And it is due to the withdrawal of Being that we are still not thinking. In contrast to Hegel’s notion of history, Heidegger’s is a history wherein we find ourselves increasingly fallen from and more distant from Being. Being withdraws in our technological age as the experience of thinking is reduced to calculative rationality. “Thinking” has become the experience of using rationality as a device to operate on a world of things already reified into a network of ends. In our age, Heidegger (1968) will go on to argue, ratio has trumped legein. The thoughtfulness of calculative rationality threatens to obliterate the possibility for being-thoughtful.
An article from Critical Thinking website which has useful links
A useful article
A propos of the quote from Doris Lessing,I turn over this question in; my mind.Thinking is not having sentences or words passing through our conscious mind like,I envy that person who has just been on a cruise/bought a large house;did I lock the door; is my new neighbour gay;why am I here?
I assume people meditate to stop that mental chatter.If you stop it you may find a painful feeling hiding.
So what is thinking?My mind goes blank.Is it a conversation with onesself or another?
When we have to make a decision,talking it over enables a seeing of different aspects/by one’s self,thinking may be a kind of confrontation .facing some idea,,,,dwelling on it.
It seems so simple but I don’t know what it is.
A thorough exposition of Levinas thought from Stanford Philosophy Dept
This seems the most comprehensive account I can find of Levinas work and also a brief biography.I ammm waiting for my book which may be simpler.If not I’ll study this
I found quite a good short account of the main outlines of Levinas’ life and work here.How very ironic he studied with Heidegger.His ideas seem very different from the philosophy I have studied before.I am well read but have only just heard of him when reading about Peter Lomas.I feel he may be very important in this world we now dwell in.I am unsure if I can understand his writing but have ordered a book by colin Davis
“I’ve always found that the better the book I’m reading, the smarter I feel, or, at least, the more able I am to imagine that I might, someday, become smarter.”
― Francine Prose, Reading Like a : A Guide for People Who Love Books and for Those Who Want to Write Them
This book is fascinating whether or not you are writer
I never even heard of wikiquotes!Then I find a whole page on Lessing.Oddly.though I read most of her books years ago I didn’t register most of these sentences.She is more than just a novelist,or should I say she is what novelists may aspire to be.,she thinks truthfully and with imagination
I greatly like the writer Francine Prose and just read an interview witth her.And secondly I found a piece where she talks about her favorite books.I looked at her images on Google Image because I like faces.There are lots of photos of her at different ages and in different moods.I think she has a fascinating face.And mind
I use the word sceptical deliberately for this book owes a great deal to the sceptical tradition within philosophy. This position has nothing to do with an extreme posturing found in some self styled postmodernist circles that questions whether we can really know anything, whether there is any such thing as truth. (According to some extreme variants there is no objective truth – except, apparently, the statement that there is none.)
Gordon, Paul (2012-12-15). Face to Face (Kindle Locations 85-88). Paul Gordon. Kindle Edition.
ShimonZ’s book likes in modern literature.. a useful collection of books here
Although Peter Lomas was a psychoanalyst he was a rare rebel,a wonderful writer and a master of the language
I read his books regularly for their wisdom and courage.And his stories.Most of all I love his truthfulness
“In this regard, the centrality of ethics in human relations, I think Peter has much in common with Emmanuel Levinas, the French Jewish thinker who put ethics at the very heart of our being, as what makes us human beings, ethics in the sense of the priority of the other and our responsibility to that other. Of course Levinas’s language was not Peter’s, but for myself I still find him inspiring, despite the predictably obscurantist and cliched ways in which his thought has been taken up and the horribly religious-like tone of too many conversations about his work. Not for the first time is a return to the source called for.”
From the cited article
If you look in the comments,ShimonZ has put a link to a fascinatingly good review in the NYT about Norman Mail.r.Plus you can see Shimon’s own likes for novels you may wish to read.As for the photos…
More ideas for what to read this winter
If you want to be well supplied with reading for the winter,here is someone who wrote both novels and the famous book,The Second Sex.You probably already know de Beauvoir was the partner of Jean Paul Sartre though it was an open relationship.Despite her saying she wanted freedom I suspect she was not totally happy with that situation and also had many abortions….such a choice is not one most women would make.Here is an interview with her in the Paris Review
But I just want to introduce her novels here.And thisis for a gneral reader,not an academic.
The most ambitious is “The Mandarins“.It is very much based on her own life and caused much pain to her ex lover Nelson Algren,the writer.You will get a very good idea of post war intellectual life in Paris amongst the founders of
Existentialism .And there are many portraits of those people and their relationships.My probelns with this novel is
It looks like a novel
It feels like a novel
It’s written like a novel
But does it come alive?
For me it is too cerebral and there is little /contribution from or openness to the Imagination.I feel it was written by will power and not by the head and heart.Everything is a little detached,a little cold
On the other hand where is all that commitment now in our political/cultural life?