Axes are useful, real and imaginary.Does our earth have them?
Borrow one in sums.Not nice.Arithmetic sucks
Calculus is based on non-understanding of first principles which may not be understandable like certain jokes.
Drawing graphs is an art and a science.
Euclid has frightened some and delighted others.And a right angle to you as well.
Flatland is a book set in an imaginary two-dimensional world.Fractions frighten
Geometry gave way to algebra.Godel studied axiomatic systems.
God was a Word not a number……. think about it.
Hard as maths is, there is a non-sensual beauty in there somewhere
It takes your mind off the pain when you try to visualise 4 dimensions.Be aware some never return.
Jokes are not often found in our textbooks except the biggest.. that God likes jigsaws, geometry and juggling.
Kurt Godel went mad.He proved maths cannot have a complete set of axioms with no contradictions.So don’t go there
Logic is not identical with mathematics.
Multiplication tables were sung by children at school in the past.Matrices are rows and columns of numbers.
Number theory is harder than one would imagine from counting one’s digits.
Operators are imaginary concepts which have an effect on other imaginary concepts which then contribute to nuclear physics, and a few other things like the end of the world.
Probability seems to be part of the nature of the world despite Einstein’s famous words. God does not play dice.
Quantitative methods were what they called maths to stop the anxiety students felt.But it’s a bad name.
Reason is only part of mathematics
Straight lines can meet.
Theorems can be interesting if you know why you are learning them
Why? Why indeed.Wranglers are top mathematics students at Cambridge.
X or x is often the unknown we look for.
Y is like X just by historical usage
Zero as a concept with a sign is more abstract than One.Hence its late arrival on the human scene.
Nothing can be symbolised. Ain’t that wonderful?
Day: October 31, 2017
News for Newts
· 
1.When do you use a colon, the teacher asked?
The girl responded: after our food is digested, until we can evacuate the remains of the prey.
2 What is a full stop, the teacher continued?
Death, answered the child
3.What’s a comma?
A coma spelt wrongly.
4.What is a question mark ?
It’s how high a grade the question gets.
5.What is a sentence?
It is what inferior criminals get.The superior ones get away with everything
6 What is syntax?
Is it a fine for adulterers or companies that evade tax? Or is it a Saint called Axe?
7.What is a paragraph?
Well, it’s got something in common with paramilitary.And with geometry.
The War in Mathematics.
8.What is the Platonic Realm?
It’s heavenly with no sex.
9.What is the Socratic Method?
Is it like the Rhythm Method but harder.Like controlling conceptions by the intellect alone?
10.What is the Solar System?
It’s Central Heating using solar panels on the roof.
11 What is the Milky Way?
Is it bottle feeding babies?
12.Am I astute?
I don’t know what a Stute is.Is it a relative of the Newts?
13 Am I a tutor?
Amae Atuta… Is she a film star?
14 Have you done your best to pass this test?
Yes,I am building a tunnel under your desk into the garden.I’m in league with The Gaza Strip.
15 What is the Gaza Strip?
Is it going through a checkpoint into Israel?
16 What is a Bedouin?
I can’t be doing with this.
17.Where is Jerusalem?
In Shropshire near Wenlock Edge or in South Lancashire where there are dark,satanic mills now used as Mail Order Firms or Call Centres.
19 What is a Temple?
It’s near your forehead.
20.What is a Cathedral?
It’s like an Epidural but they put a catheter in so you don’t need to go to the toilet while you are having the baby.
21.What is the Vatican?
Surely you must know that at your age!
22 What does “when in Rome do as the Romans do mean?”
Don’t be original.Plagiarise like mad.
23 What was the Trojan Horse
It’s what they used in Troja instead of buses.It pulled a carriage or even two
24 Who was Julius Caesar?
Was he the man who worked getting the property off the bankrupt?
25 Why do people go to Oxford and Cambridge?
Is it something to do with particles in quantum mechanics where one particle can go through 2 different holes at exactly the same time.
So one person could go through Oxford and Cambridge simultaneously especially if Bletchley Station was open.
26 Will you get a place at Oxford?
No, I’m too intellectual.I’m thinking more like, Anthrax if I get a scholarship.
27 What about Cambridge?
Is it something to do with Prince George starting school?
28.What do you think of Birmingham?
It seemed a good idea at the time.
29 Durham is an ancient university.What do you think of that?
I’ve never seen it yet.Is it behind the Cathedral? I saw that once from a train
30 What about Newcastle?
It’s still got a coal mine worked by Holy Spirits.They all speak Geordie.
31 How about Tel Aviv?
You tell them
32 And Iran?
I wish it were still called Persia.
33 Do names matter?
Only if you don’t know them.
34 Should we go to Church?
Only if we have OCD.
35 And Confession?
Always an error.
36 Am I mad?
Probably but no worse than anyone else except the man who is on Twitter all night.
37 Are you depressed?
Stop pressing me.
38 And Freud?
The bacon that Jews couldn’t eat
39 .Is it good to understand things?
It’s better to evoke~
40 What is penance?
The size of my pension
As it tempted us to sin.
My lover stole my comb because
My golden hair too ruly was.
He sometimes brushed it with his chin;
And so our life of love began.
He swept the floor with my hairbrush.
So more tangled and more lush
My locks became and that pleased him.
As it tempted us to sin.
Unruly were his passions once
As on his knee I was ensconced.
But later ,he preferred the cat.
Even as she she scratched and spat.
I see now he preferred furred beasts.
And met them on his nightly trysts.
I should not have cut off my hair.
Nor made it ruly and less fair.
I dyed it to a shade of red
Far too fierce for my dear head.
I dyed it green like apples fair
And I forgot that he would care.
Now it’s golden like a crown
And in ringlets it does fall down.
Alas it is too late,I know.
For he is dead and lies below.
I should have heeded his advice
Never be too kind nor wise.
Hide your eloquence so great.
And always make your courtiers wait.
Unfortunately I was entranced
Watching numbers so advanced;
Infinities of different size
So no ruliness presides.
Yet our own lives are finite.
A few brief hours of gold sunlight.
A few of those by lovers ruled;
Precious days each full of jewels
When we descend into the night
Blackness rules and we can’t fight.
So the ruly come to dust.
Even when they passed their tests.
And the unruly also die.
With the worms the gold locks lie.
Wedding rings and jewellery
Are of no more use to me.
Yes, the unruly also die..
Though they may have felt more joy.
Not compelled to obey all,
They don’t complain when dark night falls.
Oh,my apple, I still care;
I still love you,my own dear.
I think of you and never rue
The love that was twixt you and me.
In my dreams we danced again
Music played and love outran
All the numbers in my books.
Infinite were our loving looks.
Aleph null and aleph one,
By the Hebrews naming done.
No doubt God knows the full gist.
How we sang and dance and kissed.
.
Lions and tigers pitied the distraught.
A lion must kill, be savage with its jaws
But only other humans desire souls
A tiger has no sense but natural laws
A lion will sleep replete, his head on paws
Jews were buried live with bodies whole
A lion must kill, devour beasts with its jaws
Why do we do evil; what’s our cause?
The earth was heaving live, what can we know?
Thee tiger senses merely natural laws
In a strange dilemma, we are caught
How did we make murder a shared goal?
A lion must kill and eat its prey still raw
The few live Jews came home and home they sought
Yet were murdered, flung alive down holes
Lions and tigers pitied the distraught.
Now the bones of Jews mingle with coal
Where are they dwelling now, who raised their souls?
A lion must kill to eat with its own jaws
A tiger has no sense but nature’s laws
Will you got to Heaven and share with all?
The Warsaw Jews, the European trolls
How the Ten Commandments still annoy
The men of greed, the bankers, souls forlorn
Europe died when Europe made Great Wars
Europe did not live by any law
Staggering on, we do not know we died
When we killed the Jews, the Lord’s allies.
A letter
Dear Katherine
Your blog is very rude.After I got to the bottom of the page and by the way that was no easy task with all the stuff you write, what did I see but “Older Pests press here”
Well,I am mortally wounded.I know we disagree on much but I thought I was doing you a favour visiting you instead of preying like I used to do.
I can’t believe you have changed so much in the last five years and I am puzzled about how I ever loved you.Well, to be honest, that was a lie.It’s just a rapid way of getting someone to open up without spending years getting to know them in the usual way
Yet I did think you loved me true though I never deserved your patience and gentleness.To prove it I hit you with a brick and a bit if brac as well but does that mean you may demean me and call me an Older Pest? Just Pest is cruel enough, why add Older? We are all older but so I keep mentioning it
Did I ever give you any child maintenance? I think I forgot but as you seem fairly intelligent I imagine you have made money one way or another.There’s nothing wrong with being a harlot as long as you keep it secret.And with your IQ I imagine you did.Now he’s at school maybe I will visit you and give you a piece of my mind
On second thoughts,I confess I am scared of you as you might wish to castrate me like mother tried to do.What is it with women?You hug them, kiss them and then they want a new kitchen!Well I shan’t do that again
Is a Pest always a sexual Pest?From your papers I see you have lots of them/.Maybe it is to them you refer and not to me.If so,I never apologise but I did not mean to offend you for more than a year or so.
I’m in a Care Home now.They care and I moan.Just like being married really.God knows why women still love men
Lots of hate and a dash of admiration
Peter Pesky Ph.D { Oxen}
Professor Superfluous [ fired from 6 Universities ]
Peter
The sacrifice of meaning, Matthew Bowker

“Perhaps this is the absurd lesson of Job: that our choice is either to accept loss and make it meaningful or to protest it in absurdity, which costs us our ability to mean. If we choose the former, it need not be because we are satisfied that there is a universal order or great warum that justifies our losses, but because our meaning-making power is all we have to trade, and to give it up is to sacrifice our ability to act meaningfully in the world. On the other hand, if we are to follow the example of Camus’ 1958) vaunted “fastidious assassins” who demanded self-sacrifice as the only just compensation for performing acts of terrorism, then when confronted with extraordinary inhumanity or injustice, perhaps only the sacrifice of our ability to mean is meaningful.”
When it is a long dark evening look at beautiful birds by Mike Flemming
How to come over better at work..for women…..what rubbish

Apparently standing up straight does more for you than going to Cambridge
Looking slim is better than 5 A*’s at A level.What are women for?
Being beautiful is great for career acceleration into the lap of some mad dominating mogul.Carry some tailors’ pins and practice elbowing men in the groin with a rubber male doll.Try to look menacing now and then
Making eye contact is an error as men thin you are coming on to them but if you don’t they will say you are autistic.If you are autistic it’s big advantage should you wish to become a mathematician.We are nearly all autistic… just mildly, of course.Getting obsessed with Fermat’s Last theorem is more fun than gambling or getting drunk
Getting obsessed with yourself is not so good.Get obsessed about infinity and the fact there are different orders of infinity,Make sure you tell your lover about aleph null and aleph one while they are caressing you on the sofa while you watch Henning Mankel’s latest TV film.Who wants to watch TV
Carry a tennis racket to “accidentally” hit men or omen who violate your boundaries.Or a heavy handbag full of pens and keys is often useful.
Tell men you don’t remove your tampon so they can suck your blood.Why don’t they do it like vampires? God,I’ve never heard of such absolutely dreadful things until Weinstein got into trouble.What next? I don’t want to got there
Do men want to suck our blood because they are anaemic? Have you ever heard such things before?
I think I might be a lesbian now.I am a lapsed heterosexual.
So called paradoxical traits of creative people

https://www.fastcompany.com/3016689/10-paradoxical-traits-of-creative-people
10. CREATIVE PEOPLE’S OPENNESS AND SENSITIVITY OFTEN EXPOSES THEM TO SUFFERING AND PAIN, YET ALSO TO A GREAT DEAL OF ENJOYMENT.
“Perhaps the most important quality, the one that is most consistently present in all creative individuals, is the ability to enjoy the process of creation for its own sake. Without this trait, poets would give up striving for perfection and would write commercial jingles, economists would work for banks where they would earn at least twice as much as they do at universities, and physicists would stop doing basic research and join industrial laboratories where the conditions are better and the expectations more predictable.”
Paradoxical or not, what I have learned most is that there is no formula for individual creation. As Mihay says, “creative individuals are remarkable for their ability to adapt to almost any situation and to make do with whatever is at hand to reach their goals.” So, more than anything else, what it takes to be creative is resourcefulness and the courage not to give up.
The art of poetry with George Seferis
https://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/4112/george-seferis-the-art-of-poetry-no-13-george-seferis
ISSUE 50, FALL 1970

INTERVIEWER
Do you think there’s an advantage—as I think Cavafy would probably have thought—to being in dialogue with historians? In other words, do you feel that history has something particular to say to the poet?
SEFERIS
If you remember, Cavafy was proud of having a sense of history. He used to say: “I am a man of history”—something like that, I don’t remember the exact quotation. I am not that way; but still, I feel the pressure of history. In another way, perhaps: more mythological, more abstract, or more concrete . . . I don’t know.
INTERVIEWER
How about the relation of the Greek poet to his particular historical tradition? You once said that there is no ancient Greece in Greece. What did you mean by that exactly?
SEFERIS
I meant Greece is a continuous process. In English the expression “ancient Greece” includes the meaning of “finished,” whereas for us Greece goes on living, for better or for worse; it is in life, has not expired yet. That is a fact. One can make the same argument when one discusses the pronunciation of ancient Greek. Your scholars in America or in England or in France may be quite right in adopting the Erasmic pronunciation: for them Greek is a dead language; but for us it is another story. The fact is, you consider that ancient Greek has terminated its function at a certain point, and this enables you to pronounce it—with my regrets—in an arbitrary way.
INTERVIEWER
Then you obviously see the Greek tradition in language, as well as in other things, as a continuous process. That is not the belief of some classical and Byzantine scholars in this country—and, I suppose, elsewhere.
SEFERIS
You know why that happens? Because the subject, the history, of Greece is so large that each scholar limits himself to a certain period or branch, and nothing exists outside of it. For example, Gibbon considered that a thousand years of life were a decline. How can a people be in decline for a thousand years? After all, between the Homeric poems and the birth of Christ eight hundred years elapsed—or something like that—and then presumably there were a thousand years of decline.
INTERVIEWER
On the question of the Greek poet’s relation to his tradition, it has always seemed to me that the Greek poet has an advantage over his Anglo-Saxon counterpart who makes use of Greek mythology and sometimes even of Greek landscape. I remember years ago when I was writing a thesis on what I thought were English influences in the poetry of Cavafy and Seferis, I asked you about certain images that crop up in your landscape, for example, the symbolic meaning of the statues that appear in your work. You turned to me and said: “But those are real statues. They existed in a landscape I had seen.” What I think you were saying is that you always start with the fact of a living, actual setting and move from there to any universal meaning that might be contained in it.
SEFERIS
An illustration of that from someone who is a specialist in classical statues came the other day from an English scholar who was lecturing about the statuary of the Parthenon. I went up to congratulate him after his lecture, and he said to me, as I remember: “But you have a line which expresses something of what I meant when you say ‘the statues are not the ruins—we are the ruins.’” I mean I was astonished that a scholar of his caliber was using a line from me to illustrate a point.
INTERVIEWER
The imagery that a poet gets from his childhood is something we’ve discussed before. You once distinguished yourself from the average Englishman by suggesting that donkeys probably did for you what footballs and cars might do for them. I remember you also talked about the sea and the sailors of your native village near Smyrna.
Can modern poetry be saved?

https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2013/06/can-modern-poetry-be-saved/314001/
At the same time, Edmundson’s premise requires some scrutiny. He focuses primarily on the species of poet whose work appears in organs like The New Yorker, where verse is treated, much like the magazine’s infamous cartoons, as page filler, utterly subordinate to the long-form journalism and fiction that dominates the magazine’s feature well. “Many of the poems published in, say, The New Yorker feel just like the linguistic equivalent of a vanilla-scented candle,” the author Courtney Queeney noted in 2009. A year later, Slate observed that New Yorker poems tend to obsess over the craft of poetry itself. By design, New Yorkerpoems don’t distract or tantalize. They don’t grasp for what lies beyond, much less the reality before us. They don’t question authority. Of course, this may concern members of the literati like Mark Edmundson. But it is not exactly proof of a decaying form.

